Daniel Garrie
Daniel Garrie is the founder and managing partner at Law & Forensics. Daniel is paving the way when it comes to 2018’s most pressing cyber security, forensic, and legal issues. Daniel, one of the most sought-after computer forensic experts and special masters, cyber mediators, and forensic neutrals with JAMS. Judges and attorneys laud his reports for their clarity, focus, and ability to help parties settle even the most complex disputes. Mr. Garrie has garnered a national reputation for his experience at the intersection of technology and the law and is as comfortable talking with entrepreneurs, IT professionals, and developers as he is with lawyers and judges.

Contact Daniel Garrie

Hon. Gail Andler
Hon. Gail A. Andler (Ret.) joined JAMS as a full-time neutral after more than 21 years on the Orange County Superior Court where she served from 2007-2017 on the Complex Civil Litigation Panel. Judge Andler has experience across the legal spectrum including complex business, trade secret, employment, product liability, catastrophic personal injury and real estate disputes. She has managed and resolved large coordinated and consolidated product defect and injury cases in the pharmaceutical, medical device, and automotive industries, in addition to consumer and employment class actions and PAGA cases. Her time with the court also included serving two terms as the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court’s Appellate Division and she is the past President of the American College of Business Court Judges.

Contact Hon. Gail Andler

Richard Birke
Richard Birke is the Executive Director of the JAMS Institute—the teaching and training arm of JAMS. In that capacity, Birke leads a team of educators and professionals committed to providing JAMS with exceptional internal training, starting with new panelists and continuing with the nation’s most experienced neutrals. In addition, the Institute’s role as an external trainer and education provider continues to expand both domestically and internationally, with ADR courses across the U.S. and in the E.U., Asia, Latin America and North Africa.

Contact Richard Birke

1 General Credit

ProLawCLE will seek approval of any CLE program where the registering attorney is primarily licensed with exceptions stated below. Application is made at the time an attorney registers for a course, therefore approval may not be received at the time of broadcasting.

ProLawCLE does not seek approval in the state of Virginia.

Each state has its own governing rules and regulations with regards to CLE courses and formats, therefore please contact your state MCLE regulatory entity for further details about your state's rules. Please visit our State Requirements page for information regarding your state's CLE requirements and/or contact information for your state bar.

As stated in our Reciprocity Provision, ProLawCLE will grant credit in the following states through reciprocity, therefore direct application will not be made in these states:

AK, AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, KY, MA, ME, MD, MI, MO, MS, MT, NC, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH, PA, SC, SD, TN, VT, WA, WI, WV, PR

The following states are self apply. The attorney can apply for credit at no cost. We will provide documentation for them to apply:

CO, IA, NE

OH Attorneys please note: OH Supreme Court will not approve any course that was aired more than 12 months prior.

SC Attorneys please note: Registration must occur no later than 5 business days from the event date or course accreditation is not guaranteed.

ProLawCLE is dedicated to providing quality education from expert speakers and ensuring each attorney receives CLE credit for their participation. If for some reason a particular course does not receive approval in the attorney's primary state of licensure, ProLawCLE will give credit for a future approved course or give a full refund, if applicable.

Each On-Demand course is available to you for 1 year from date of purchase. Additionally, CLE credit is only available within that year.

Read our full Reciprocity Provision here

1. Deciding to Mediate and How to Select an Effective Mediator
2. Challenges of Conducting Virtual Dispute Resolution
3. Best Practices to Ensure a Successful Virtual Mediation