Live Webcast/Rebroadcast – You watch the course online at the specified date and time shown below. You can ask questions and receive answers during the course.
On-Demand – You watch the course anytime and will have access to the course 24/7. Our On-Demand courses are available within 5-10 business days after the original recording and accessible for one year.
This program was recorded on August 29, 2018
With nationwide foreclosure rates beginning to slip from historic highs, the foreclosure industry is undergoing a shift in focus from lender-based litigation to borrower-based litigation. Using the federally mandated monthly mortgage statement as a jumping off point, this course will explore the rise of borrower-based litigation under two federal statutes, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Specifically, we will examine possible causes of action and defenses under 12 CFR 1024.35 and 1024.36 as well as common areas of dispute with respect to the debt/loan information contained within monthly mortgage statements. This course will not focus on general debt collection matters nor will it examine issues related to new disclosure requirements under the TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosures or loss mitigation disputes under 12 CFR 1024.41.
Glen’s practice concentrates primarily on business litigation, deceptive trade practices, real estate litigation and consumer law with a focus on regulatory compliance under the Dodd-Frank Act and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. Prior to joining Saavedra Goodwin in 2016, Glen was an attorney with two NLJ 350 law firms where he represented numerous Fortune 500 companies focusing primarily on consumer finance and federal regulatory compliance matters.
2 General Credits
ProLawCLE will seek approval of any CLE program where the registering attorney is primarily licensed with exceptions stated below. Application is made at the time an attorney registers for a course, therefore approval may not be received at the time of broadcasting.
ProLawCLE does not seek approval in the state of Virginia.
Each state has its own governing rules and regulations with regards to CLE courses and formats, therefore please contact your state MCLE regulatory entity for further details about your state’s rules. Please visit our State Requirements page for information regarding your state’s CLE requirements and/or contact information for your state bar.
As stated in our Reciprocity Provision, ProLawCLE will grant credit in the following states through reciprocity, therefore direct application will not be made in these states:
AK, AR, CO, FL, ME, MT, ND, NH, NJ, NY, and PR.
ProLawCLE is dedicated to providing quality education from expert speakers and ensuring each attorney receives CLE credit for their participation. If for some reason a particular course does not receive approval in the attorney’s primary state of licensure, ProLawCLE will give credit for a future approved course or give a full refund, if applicable.
Each On-Demand course is available to you for 1 year from date of purchase. Additionally, CLE credit is only available within that year.
- Section I: Introduction – A Changing Landscape
- Recap of the foreclosure crisis
- Side Effect of the foreclosure crisis has been the growth of the foreclosure industry in the legal world
- The decrease in foreclosure filings by banks/lenders has lead to the growth of “foreclosure offense” practices
- A large part of this foreclosure offense stems from issues contained in “monthly mortgage statements”
- Brief explanation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”)
- Brief explanation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”)
- Section II: RESPA
- History of RESPA
- Introduction of RESPA in the 1970s
- Recession of 2007-2008 leads to revisions to RESPA
- Brief analysis of pertinent revisions
- Obtaining information from a loan servicer
- Definitions (“qualified written request”, “notice of error”, “request for information”, “loan servicer”, etc.)
- QWR/RFI process (12 CFR 1024.36)
- NOE process (12 CFR 1024.35)
- Failure to comply with RESPA requirements
- NOE following RFI
- Assessment of damages based on nature of error
- Filing suit
- Disputed Issues
- What constitutes actual damages
- What constitutes a “pattern and practice of noncompliance” for statutory damages
- 3rd party authorization issues
- What constitutes an “acknowledgement” of a QWR/RFI/NOE
- To whom must the servicer respond
- History of RESPA
- Section III: FDCPA
- History of FDCPA
- Prohibited practices generally
- What constitutes an “attempt to collect a debt”
- Substantiating damages
- Actual damages
- Statutory damages