Preservation of Mobile and Social Media Evidence

$95.00

Clear
Live Webcast/Rebroadcast – You watch the course online at the specified date and time shown below. You can ask questions and receive answers during the course.
On-Demand – You watch the course anytime and will have access to the course 24/7. Our On-Demand courses are available within 5-10 business days after the original recording and accessible for one year.

Course Description

This program was recorded on June 7, 2021

This recorded CLE webinar discusses how to properly preserve and social media evidence in litigation. The ubiquitous nature of social media has made it an unrivaled source of evidence, leading it to play a key role in countless cases. Businesses of every size can be affected by social media – both in the duty to preserve social media content and in the desire to access relevant social media evidence in litigation.

Data residing on social media platforms is subject to the same duty to preserve as other types of electronically stored information (ESI). The duty to preserve is triggered when a party reasonably foresees that evidence may be relevant to issues in litigation. All evidence in a party’s “possession, custody, or control” is subject to the duty to preserve. Evidence generally is considered to be within a party’s “control” when the party has the legal authority or practical ability to access it.

This presentation is presented by the Global Cyber Institute and Lexeprint. It is presented by Hon. Leo Gordon of the United States Court of International Trade, Dan Regard of iDiscovery Solutions, Elizabeth Koenig of International Litigation Services, and Melissa Clark of FeganScott.

Speaker Bio
1 General Credit
Course Agenda

Daniel Garrie
Daniel Garrie is the founder and managing partner at Law & Forensics. Daniel is paving the way when it comes to 2018’s most pressing cybersecurity, forensic, and legal issues. Daniel, one of the most sought-after computer forensic experts and special masters, cyber mediators, and forensic neutrals with JAMS. Judges and attorneys laud his reports for their clarity, focus, and ability to help parties settle even the most complex disputes. Mr. Garrie has garnered a national reputation for his experience at the intersection of technology and the law and is as comfortable talking with entrepreneurs, IT professionals, and developers as he is with lawyers and judges.

Contact Daniel Garrie

Dan Regard
Dan Regard is an eDiscovery and computer science consultant with 25 years’ experience in consulting to legal and corporate entities. A programmer and an attorney by training, Dan has conducted system investigations, created data collections, and managed discovery on over a thousand matters. He is responsible for the development and implementation of case and matter strategies that leverage technology in litigation and investigations. In addition, he has both national and international experience advising on such issues as eDiscovery, computer forensics, structured data, and information management. Dan is a frequent speaker, teacher, and publisher on issues of eDiscovery.

Contact Dan Regard

Elizabeth Koenig
Elizabeth advises Plaintiffs’ attorneys on all aspects of eDiscovery in high-profile mass tort and class action litigations, with notable recent cases including actions related to auto diesel emissions and airbag scandals, the opioid epidemic, aviation disasters, and e-cigarettes. Elizabeth is an ACEDS Certified E-Discovery Specialist, a member of Women in eDiscovery and the Alliance of Women Trial Lawyers, and frequently writes and presents on electronic discovery issues.

Contact Elizabeth Koenig

Hon. Leo M. Gordon
Judge Leo M. Gordon has served as a judge of the United States Court of International Trade since March 2006. Judge Gordon is responsible for resolving judicial disputes involving challenges to the administration and enforcement of the federal customs and international trade laws by principally U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the U.S. Departments of Commerce, Agriculture, and Labor, and the U.S. International Trade Commission. In addition to his judicial duties, Judge Gordon has chaired, at different times, the Court’s Rules, Budget, Public Affairs/Education, and Strategic Planning Committees. Judge Gordon began his career in 1977 as Assistant Counsel at the Subcommittee on Monopolies and Commercial Law, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives. In that capacity, Judge Gordon was the principal attorney responsible for the Customs Courts Act of 1980 that created the U.S. Court of International Trade. He also had responsibilities involving a wide range of antitrust and other commercial law legislative projects.

Contact Hon. Leo M. Gordon

1 General Credit

ProLawCLE will seek approval of any CLE program where the registering attorney is primarily licensed with exceptions stated below. Application is made at the time an attorney registers for a course, therefore approval may not be received at the time of broadcasting.

ProLawCLE does not seek approval in the state of Virginia.

Each state has its own governing rules and regulations with regards to CLE courses and formats, therefore please contact your state MCLE regulatory entity for further details about your state's rules. Please visit our State Requirements page for information regarding your state's CLE requirements and/or contact information for your state bar.

As stated in our Reciprocity Provision, ProLawCLE will grant credit in the following states through reciprocity, therefore direct application will not be made in these states:

AK, AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, KY, MA, ME, MD, MI, MO, MS, MT, NC, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH, PA, SC, SD, TN, VT, WA, WI, WV, PR

The following states are self apply. The attorney can apply for credit at no cost. We will provide documentation for them to apply:

CO, IA, NE

OH Attorneys please note: OH Supreme Court will not approve any course that was aired more than 12 months prior.

SC Attorneys please note: Registration must occur no later than 5 business days from the event date or course accreditation is not guaranteed.

ProLawCLE is dedicated to providing quality education from expert speakers and ensuring each attorney receives CLE credit for their participation. If for some reason a particular course does not receive approval in the attorney's primary state of licensure, ProLawCLE will give credit for a future approved course or give a full refund, if applicable.

Each On-Demand course is available to you for 1 year from date of purchase. Additionally, CLE credit is only available within that year.

Read our full Reciprocity Provision here

Course Agenda

  1. Document Preservation Requirements
  2. Failure to Preserve Text and Instant Messages May Result in Sanctions
  3. Best Practices for Managing Data
Monday: 9am - 6pm ET
Tuesday: 9am - 6pm ET
Wednesday: 9am - 6pm ET
Thursday: 9am - 6pm ET
Friday: 9am - 4pm ET
Saturday/Sunday: Email Only
© 2021 ProLawCLE – A Continuing Legal Education Company
envelopephone-handsetmap-marker linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram