Live Webcast/Rebroadcast – You watch the course online at the specified date and time shown below. You can ask questions and receive answers during the course.
On-Demand – You watch the course anytime and will have access to the course 24/7. Our On-Demand courses are available within 5-10 business days after the original recording and accessible for one year.
This program was recorded on January 29, 2019
Forensic psychologists are specialized in conducting mental health evaluations with those who are involved in the legal system. Sexual risk assessments are often needed at various stages of the legal process (e.g., pre-trial, trial, sentencing, community supervision, and SVP civil commitment). A forensic psychological evaluation in this context can provide information and opinions regarding a particular person’s risk for reoffending, the empirically supported risk factors associated with such, and treatment recommendations. These evaluations can often be beneficial in informing decisions related to bail motions, plea bargaining, and sentencing.
Dr. Sarah DeMarco is a Licensed Psychologist in New Jersey (#561800) and New York (#021383), and a Clinical Supervisor at Pirelli Clinical and Forensic Psychology, LLC. She earned an M.A. in Forensic Psychology from John Jay College of Criminal Justice and a Psy.D. in Clinical Psychology from the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine. Dr. DeMarco has worked with adults and adolescents in a variety of clinical-forensic and correctional settings, such as a forensic psychiatric hospital, state prisons, inpatient and outpatient substance abuse treatment centers and a juvenile detention center.Dr. DeMarco’s training has focused largely on forensic mental health assessments that address various psycholegal issues. Of particular note, Dr. DeMarco has extensive experience conducting violence and sexual violence risk assessments with both adult and juvenile offenders. Dr. DeMarco conducts psychological evaluations for the courts, capitalizing on her experience in such assessments for various civil and criminal matters. In addition to her clinical and forensic work, Dr. DeMarco is an adjunct professor in the graduate program at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
1 General Credit
ProLawCLE will seek approval of any CLE program where the registering attorney is primarily licensed with exceptions stated below. Application is made at the time an attorney registers for a course, therefore approval may not be received at the time of broadcasting.
ProLawCLE does not seek approval in the state of Virginia.
Each state has its own governing rules and regulations with regards to CLE courses and formats, therefore please contact your state MCLE regulatory entity for further details about your state’s rules. Please visit our State Requirements page for information regarding your state’s CLE requirements and/or contact information for your state bar.
As stated in our Reciprocity Provision, ProLawCLE will grant credit in the following states through reciprocity, therefore direct application will not be made in these states:
AK, AR, CO, FL, ME, MT, ND, NH, NJ, NY, and PR.
ProLawCLE is dedicated to providing quality education from expert speakers and ensuring each attorney receives CLE credit for their participation. If for some reason a particular course does not receive approval in the attorney’s primary state of licensure, ProLawCLE will give credit for a future approved course or give a full refund, if applicable.
Each On-Demand course is available to you for 1 year from date of purchase. Additionally, CLE credit is only available within that year.
- What differentiates forensic psychologists from other clinicians, including treating professionals
- Types of sexual risk assessments (e.g., pretrial and sentencing risk/mitigation, Megan’s Law removal; civil commitment or sexually violent predator [SVP])
- Overview of the principles of risk assessment
- The procedures and format of sexual risk assessments, reports, and testimony
- What differentiates internet offenders (e.g., child pornography; solicitation) from contact offenders, including assessment, report, and testimony-related considerations
- Case samples