The California Consumer Privacy Act: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Step 1: Select Desired Format

Step 2:

Live Webcast/Rebroadcast - You watch the course online at the specified date and time shown below. You can ask questions and receive answers during the course.
On-Demand - You watch the course anytime and will have access to the course 24/7. Our On-Demand courses are available within 5-10 business days after the original recording and accessible for one year.

Course Description

Live Webcast - August 17th, 2018

  • 9:00-10:30am PST / 10:00-11:30am MST / 11:00-12:30pm CST / 12:00-1:30pm EST

Have you ever posted a picture on Facebook or Instagram? Have you heard references to Cambridge Analytica and GDPR but aren’t quite sure what they mean? Do you represent clients that conduct business in California? If you answered yes to any of these questions, then join Senior Trial Attorney Kamran Salour as he leads you the through “The California Consumer Privacy Act: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.”

The course will also explore how the California Consumer Privacy Act compares to the GDPR and what consumers and companies can do to prepare for its January 2020 enactment. Two checklists, one for a company to determine whether the Act applies and another summarizing the privacy rights the Act affords consumers will also be provided.



  • Kamran Salour
    Kamran Salour represents and defends clients in business disputes often involving breach of contract, fraud, tortious interference, and unfair competition claims. Mr. Salour works closely with his clients to understand their objectives and tailors his litigation strategy around those objectives. His experience, therefore, encompasses the litigation spectrum: from dispute resolution before the onset of litigation through securing judgments for his clients after trial.

    Mr. Salour’s experience extends to cybersecurity, privacy, and data protection matters. He is a certified information privacy professional for the U.S. Sector (CIPP/US). He advises companies on cybersecurity compliance and defends them against claims of violating various privacy statutes, such as the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA). Mr. Salour is also a recognized expert in and frequent commentator on biometric privacy law. He counsels clients on compliance with US and international regulations relating to cybersecurity and data privacy, including compliance with the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

    Contact Kamran Salour
      • 1.5 General Credits
      • ProLawCLE will seek approval of any CLE program where the registering attorney is primarily licensed with exceptions stated below. Application is made at the time an attorney registers for a course, therefore approval may not be received at the time of broadcasting.

        ProLawCLE does not seek approval in the state of Virginia.

        Each state has its own governing rules and regulations with regards to CLE courses and formats, therefore please contact your state MCLE regulatory entity for further details about your state's rules. Please visit our State Requirements page for information regarding your state's CLE requirements and/or contact information for your state bar.

        As stated in our Reciprocity Provision, ProLawCLE will grant credit in the following states through reciprocity, therefore direct application will not be made in these states:

        AK, AR, CO, FL, ME, MT, ND, NH, NJ, NY, and PR.

        ProLawCLE is dedicated to providing quality education from expert speakers and ensuring each attorney receives CLE credit for their participation. If for some reason a particular course does not receive approval in the attorney's primary state of licensure, ProLawCLE will give credit for a future approved course or give a full refund, if applicable.

      Each On-Demand course is available to you for 1 year from date of purchase. Additionally, CLE credit is only available within that year.
    1. (i) the Good, the protections the Act provides to consumers and companies;
    2. (ii) the Bad, areas where the Act falls short; and
    3. (iii)the Ugly, ambiguities and provisions in the Act that will likely subject companies to class-action litigation.

Related Items